认知增强MCP服务器

structuredArgumentation

A detailed tool for systematic dialectical reasoning and argument analysis. This tool helps analyze complex questions through formal argumentation structures. It facilitates the creation, critique, and synthesis of competing arguments. When to use this tool: - Evaluating competing perspectives and claims - Analyzing complex ethical dilemmas - Assessing policy proposals with multiple stakeholders - Exploring scientific hypotheses and counter-arguments Key features: - Break down arguments into claims, premises, and conclusions - Track relationships between arguments - Represent objections and rebuttals - Facilitate dialectical progression through thesis-antithesis-synthesis - Evaluate argument strengths and weaknesses - Visualize argument structures Parameters explained: - claim: The central proposition being argued - premises: Supporting evidence or assumptions - conclusion: The logical consequence of accepting the claim - argumentType: Whether this is a thesis, antithesis, synthesis, objection, or rebuttal - confidence: Your confidence level in this argument (0.0-1.0) - respondsTo: ID of an argument this directly responds to - supports/contradicts: IDs of arguments this supports or contradicts - strengths/weaknesses: Notable strong or weak points of the argument - nextArgumentNeeded: Whether another argument is needed in the dialectic